software architecture

question:
what do you think?do you agree or disagree?why?
my answer:
I will choose medially,I think it may be right but not suitable.
As the words in the first paragraph:"it must be pointed out that the field is plowing old ground in several areas."I don't think that there are something wrong with this viewpoint,but,it's not pretty suitable.why?I will show you in steps.
Why it isn't wrong?Nowadays,knowledge is exploding rapidly,we can't do anything just by one person or group that is just in one field.In the other words,we need communication between different fields.That is why someone said:"Standing upon giant,you'll achieve further."Now I want to say:"Standing upon pyramid basing on suitable but different bricks,you'll achieve much more further."If we can extract suitable concepts from the multiple fields,redefine them,make them efficient,I think that's all right to do so.
Of course,we must know why we employ such concepts from other fields.If done,I'm sure that there must be some differences compared to the prior one.For example,architecture,as described in the article,has different meanings and usages in varied direction.So,that's why I said it's not pretty suitable.We are plowing old ground,that's fine,but,we didn't just do plowing,we plow it in different ways with different purposes,and get different results.We don't do it again,but do it another.
that's all.